Amended U.S. Country of Origin Labelling Regulations Go from Bad to Worse

Farmscape for May 24, 2013

The Canadian Pork Council warns amendments to U.S. Country of Origin Labelling regulations will increase the discrimination against imported livestock that prompted Canada and Mexico to challenge the legislation at the World Trade Organization.
In 2011 a World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Panel ruled in favor of Canada and Mexico, that U.S. Mandatory Country of Origin Labelling discriminates against imported livestock and last December the U.S. was been given until May 23, 2013 to change the legislation or risk retaliatory tariffs.
Yesterday, in response to the order, the U.S. issued a final rule amending labelling provisions for muscle cut covered commodities to require the origin designation to indicate where each production step occurred and to remove the allowance for commingling.
Canadian Pork Council vice-chair Rick Bergmann says the legislation has gone from bad to worse.

Clip-Rick Bergmann-Canadian Pork Council:
The new rule will really strip away any flexibility to comingle Canadian and U.S. animals at processing plants so really the new rule doesn't do anything in the reduction of the discrimination.
What it does is it enhances it again.
This ruling is certainly to the chagrin of Canadian producers but it's also a concern for AMI, the American Meat Institute and many others in the U.S. who see this as something harmful.

Canada and Mexico can now appeal to the WTO for a ruling on whether the changes bring the U.S. law into compliance and request the authority to impose retaliatory tariffs on imported U.S. products.
Bergmann notes the Canadian Pork Council would prefer to avoid retaliation but it will be standing behind the federal government as it moves forward.
For Farmscape.Ca, I'm Bruce Cochrane.


       *Farmscape is a presentation of Sask Pork and Manitoba Pork Council